Skip to content
Biodatica

Coverage

What is actually in the graph

Counted from the database when you loaded this page. A data product that will not tell you the shape of its own coverage is asking you to take its word for everything, and this one is not going to do that. Where the graph is thin, this page says so.

Nothing has been ingested yet. The graph is empty: no companies, no events, and no source has completed a run. Every number below would be a zero, so they are not being dressed up as a result. Scheduled pulls start the sources on their own cadence: ClinicalTrials.gov, SEC EDGAR and openFDA daily; NIH RePORTER, USPTO and SBIR.gov weekly.

Companies
0
Events
0

0 dated in the last 7 days

Crosswalk links
0

each with its evidence recorded

Last ingest

no successful run recorded

Source status

The last run of each scheduled pull, straight from the ingest cursors. A source that skipped or failed is listed as such, with whatever note the run left behind.

Last run, status and watermark for each ingestion source
SourceCadenceLast runStatusWatermarkNote
NIH RePORTERWeeklyNever run
SBIR.govWeeklyNever run
ClinicalTrials.govDailyNever run
SEC EDGARDailytodayPart-way through2025-01-13through 2025-01-13: 0 biotech Form D of 800 fetched
USPTOWeeklyNever run
openFDADailyNever run

By therapeutic area

Coverage starts at a beachhead and widens. Depth beats breadth: a clean graph in one area is worth more than a thin one everywhere.

No companies yet.

Companies that have not been classified into an area yet are visible on every seat, because gating a company on a label we have not assigned would hide it from everyone.

By stage

Where companies sit on the ladder. A graph weighted toward the early rungs is the graph working as intended: that is the window nobody else covers.

  • Grant-only0
  • Formed0
  • Preclinical0
  • IND-enabling0
  • Phase I0
  • Phase II0
  • Phase III0
  • Filed/Approved0

Resolution quality

The crosswalk is the asset, and it is built by a scorer with a human behind it. These are the numbers that say how much of it a person has actually looked at.

Human-confirmed
0

Auto-merged only
0

above the merge threshold, not reviewed by a person

Waiting for review
0

ambiguous matches queued for a human

Mean confidence

across companies with a recorded confidence

Reviewed and merged: 0. Reviewed and rejected: 0. A rejected candidate is a wrong merge that did not happen, which is the queue doing its job.

Where the data comes from · How resolution decides, and what the numbers do not know · Open the feed